LSLR Collaborative
  • Home
  • Roadmap
    • Getting Started
    • Legal Factors
    • Funding
    • Plan Development
  • Replacement
    • Approaches to Replacement
    • Preparing an Inventory
    • Understanding Replacement Techniques
    • Communicating About LSLs
    • Coordinating Replacement
  • Equity
    • Guide to Equity Analysis
    • Coordination and Partnership
    • Defining Disadvantaged Communities
    • Equity Tools and Data Sources
  • Policies
    • Community Access to Funding
    • Helping Consumers
    • Requiring LSL Replacement
    • Engaging other Programs
    • Risk Communication Improvement
  • EPA's LCR
    • Key Terms
    • Key Requirements and Opportunities
  • Resources
    • Intro to LSL Replacement
    • LSL Replacement in the News
    • Child Care and Schools
    • Role of Public Health Professionals
    • Webinars >
      • Upcoming Webinars and Events
    • Case Examples
    • Filling Data Gaps
    • Recursos en Español
    • Downloadable Resources
    • Matchmaking Survey
  • About Us
    • FAQs
    • Feedback

LSL Replacement in the NEWS​

Murphy’s Target: Replace All Lead Service Lines in NJ by 2029

10/11/2019

 
See the original article in NJ Spotlight.

​On Thursday, Gov. Phil Murphy unveiled a sweeping agenda designed to eliminate New Jersey’s lead contamination problem in 10 years. The plan includes replacing every lead service line that’s leaching the potent toxin into drinking water and requiring every child to be tested for lead before starting school.

“It is time for us to ensure that New Jerseyans are safe from lead exposure, and that generations to come remain safe,” said Murphy. “The damage that is done to kids who have exposure — and it’s not treated, it’s not known — is so overwhelmingly obvious.”

Getting the lead out will be a massive task.

Information from New Jersey water utilities estimates 350,000 lead service lines need to be replaced statewide, and that the cost to replace them all could top $2 billion.

Murphy would remediate the lead problem by asking voters to approve a $500 million bond issue in November 2020 to help public water utilities with paying for lead service line replacement. His goal: to replace all lead service lines within a decade.

He would permit private water utilities to raise rates to help cover costs, estimated at about $6,000 per home. The plan would require home sellers to disclose all lead in the house, whether in pipes or paint, and create a “Lead Free” certificate for renters.

Schools would have to test every three years and clearly post the results, and children would need a lead blood test to start school.

High blood lead levels in children
A 2017 survey showed 5% to 7% of kids ages 6 to 26 months had blood lead levels over the federal limit in cities like Irvington, East Orange and Newark.

“The problem is, there’s not an enforcement arm, it’s there to look at that and make sure it’s occurring. We usually see only about half of the kids are actually getting those tests when they need to be getting them — at the earlier ages when they’re going to be having the most detrimental effects,” said Ben Haygood, director of environmental health policy at Isles, a community-based environmental organization in Trenton.

The governor’s plan closely follows a task force report issued by Jersey Water Works, which notes 80% of child lead contamination comes from lead paint.
The plan makes home inspections more robust and would train more lead evaluation inspectors and abatement contractors.

There could be opposition to some aspects of the plan; a legal fight is already brewing over one water company’s initiative to surcharge ratepayers for the cost of the lead service line replacement.

“We won’t be able to know exactly what the increases are until each utility does the math,” said Chris Sturm of NJ Future, an advocacy group pushing for water infrastructure improvement. “But then you look at total number of lead service lines across New Jersey and the cost of replacing them, it’s really not that big of a number. We understand the concern, but the cost is children’s health.”

New Jersey’s Division of Rate Counsel director Stefanie Brand calls the direct utility surcharge illegal, adding that “allowing utilities to charge ratepayers for work done on private property is a slippery slope that could vastly increase rates and cause hardship for the very people we are trying to help. Where would the obligation end?”

Murphy acknowledged ratepayers would feel some pain.

“We will support the Legislature putting forward the ability of those investor-owned utilities with, we hope, a modest impact on the ratepayer to put replacement into their rate base,” said the governor.
​
The governor said he has reached out to legislative leaders to get them on board while the details of the plan are still being hammered out.



Comments are closed.
    Picture
    Have a suggestion for an article or blog to add?
    Let us know!

    Type

    All
    Announcements
    Articles/ Blogs On The Collaborative
    News/ Blogs About LSLs

    Date

    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017

    RSS Feed

Home
About Us
Feedback
The goal of the Lead Service Line Replacement Collaborative is to accelerate voluntary lead service line replacement in communities across the United States.
Links to external resources do not constitute an endorsement from the Collaborative.
  • Home
  • Roadmap
    • Getting Started
    • Legal Factors
    • Funding
    • Plan Development
  • Replacement
    • Approaches to Replacement
    • Preparing an Inventory
    • Understanding Replacement Techniques
    • Communicating About LSLs
    • Coordinating Replacement
  • Equity
    • Guide to Equity Analysis
    • Coordination and Partnership
    • Defining Disadvantaged Communities
    • Equity Tools and Data Sources
  • Policies
    • Community Access to Funding
    • Helping Consumers
    • Requiring LSL Replacement
    • Engaging other Programs
    • Risk Communication Improvement
  • EPA's LCR
    • Key Terms
    • Key Requirements and Opportunities
  • Resources
    • Intro to LSL Replacement
    • LSL Replacement in the News
    • Child Care and Schools
    • Role of Public Health Professionals
    • Webinars >
      • Upcoming Webinars and Events
    • Case Examples
    • Filling Data Gaps
    • Recursos en Español
    • Downloadable Resources
    • Matchmaking Survey
  • About Us
    • FAQs
    • Feedback